Analysis of Information Technology Governance Using Domain EDM in the SMP XYZ Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61098/jkst.v2i2.69Kata Kunci:
COBIT 5, Maturity Level, GAP Analysis, Information Technology GovernanceAbstrak
The main goal of this study is to assess SMP XYZ Jakarta's IT governance implementation and maturity. This report provides a complete analysis, strategic recommendations, and strategies for enhancing system efficiency and functionality to improve operational outcomes. A COBIT 5 maturity value evaluation at SMP XYZ Jakarta found GAP Analysis shortcomings in many domains. In particular, EDM01 and EDM02 exhibit possible governance structure and benefit distribution concerns with discrepancies of -0.33 and -0.16, respectively. Risk optimization is substantial for EDM03, which has a positive disparity of 0.34. EDM04 emphasizes efficient resource allocation with a differential of -0.33, whereas EDM05 signals stakeholder transparency needs with 0.17. The governance structure's strengths and weaknesses are shown by the average domain disparity of -0.31. Data from questionnaires reveal proficiency in subdomains like EDM01 governance framework construction. Also noted were benefits delivery (EDM02) and risk optimization (EDM03). EDM04 and EDM05's predicted level 3 progress supports SMP XYZ Jakarta's ambitious governance framework improvement target.
Unduhan
Referensi
P. A. Moonda and B. Norita, “Audit Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Framework Cobit 5 (Studi Kasus : PT. Jamkrida Provinsi Jawa Tengah),” J. Masy. Inform., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2020, doi: 10.14710/jmasif.11.1.31449.
S. De Haes and W. Van Grembergen, Enterprise Governance of Information Technology. 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-84882-2.
L. D. Oktaviana, P. Pribadi, and M. Sabrinawati, “Evaluasi IT Governance Menggunakan Framework COBIT 5 ( Studi Kasus : PT . XYZ ),” Pro Bisnis, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 56–68, 2019.
F. S. Sulaeman, “Audit Sistem Informasi Framework Cobit 5,” Media J. Inform., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 37–42, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/mjinformatika/article/download/139/78
A. A. Prawoto, “It Governance in News Company Using Cobit 5 Frameworks,” Sisforma, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2019, doi: 10.24167/sisforma.v6i1.1927.
N. Lediwara, “Analisis IT Governance Menggunakan Framework Cobit 5 Domain DSS, MEA dan BAI,” Pseudocode, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 2020, doi: 10.33369/pseudocode.7.2.97-104.
R. Reynard and W. Wella, “COBIT 5: Tingkat Kapabilitas pada PT Supra Boga Lestari,” J. Ultim. InfoSys, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 18–23, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.31937/si.v9i1.712.
W. Wella and S. A. Sirapanji, “Evaluasi Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Universitas Multimedia Nusantara Periode 2016,” J. Ultim. InfoSys, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 60–64, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.31937/si.v7i2.541.
ISACA, A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT. 2012.
ISACA, Governance and Management Objectives. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.isaca.org/resources/cobit
Isaca, COBIT 5 Implementation. ISACA, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.isaca.org/COBIT/Pages/COBIT-5-spanish.aspx
D. Lanter, COBIT 5: Enabling Processes. ISACA, 2012. [Online]. Available: www.isaca.org/cobit
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2023 Erick Fernando, Yulius Denny Prabowo, Jullend Gatc
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Penulis menyimpan hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama naskah secara simultan dengan lisensi di bawah Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) yang mengizinkan orang lain untuk berbagi pekerjaan dengan sebuah pernyataan kepenulisan pekerjaan dan penerbitan awal di jurnal ini. Penulis bisa memasukkan ke dalam penyusunan kontraktual tambahan terpisah untuk distribusi non ekslusif versi kaya terbitan jurnal (contoh: mempostingnya ke repositori institusional atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
